Same pattern, every year, for as long as I’ve taught AP Lang: a student can identify rhetorical devices on a quiz, then sit down to write the rhetorical analysis essay and produce a summary instead. They tell me what the passage says. They never quite get to what the writer is doing and why it works — which is the entire task.
Every generic rubric description of "strong analysis" failed to close that gap for my students. What finally worked was showing them the gap directly.
See it on Teachers Pay Teachers — $16.99
The centerpiece of the fifteen-day unit is a real College Board 9/9 essay and a real 5/9 essay, on the same prompt, both annotated line by line — so students see the exact difference between competent analysis and genuinely sophisticated analysis, rather than being told it exists. Around that sits an 85-slide foundation on rhetorical situation and strategy, a 36-term glossary, a CEAA paragraph structure template, and timed practice against the authentic 2018 FRQ.
Twenty years of watching the same gap open up in the same place taught me what actually closes it. It isn’t a better definition of analysis. It’s watching two real essays sit side by side.
Leave a comment